?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 

Large images don't seem to upload right.

About  

Previous Entry Large images don't seem to upload right. Apr. 4th, 2005 @ 01:17 pm Next Entry
Yesterday I tried to upload a couple of panoramas. It never seemed like LJ was happy though, so I removed them. The smaller image, about 10000x750 pixels, was able to be viewed in the tiny-thumbnail and the full sizde image, but not the middle thumbnail. The full size image, about 22000x1700 pixels, didn't do much at all, even after waiting a while for things to finish on the server end.

Are my images out of the realm of Fotobilder, or should I just have faith and wait longer for something to happen?
Leave a comment
[User Picture Icon]
From:flashfire
Date:April 5th, 2005 05:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
How large are the files? They might be too much to be uploadable.
[User Picture Icon]
From:schlake
Date:April 5th, 2005 05:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The file was 6MB, which is less than the 30MB limit advertised. It uploaded, but seemed to never become available.
[User Picture Icon]
From:flashfire
Date:April 5th, 2005 05:20 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Ah. I got nothing, then. Sorry. :-)
[User Picture Icon]
From:penexpers
Date:April 5th, 2005 08:43 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Images of that size should be kept off the internet, imo.
From:j4k0b
Date:April 5th, 2005 09:34 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Aside from that being entirely not the point, why? It's a panoramic, of course its going to be wide.
[User Picture Icon]
From:penexpers
Date:April 5th, 2005 09:49 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Until we get monitors that can handle 22000 pixels horizontally (was that typo?), the intended effect is just going to be lost.
[User Picture Icon]
From:schlake
Date:April 5th, 2005 10:08 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The intent was that I was making an image about as tall as most peoples monitors that they could scroll sideways to get a look around.
[User Picture Icon]
From:jaimekeane
Date:April 10th, 2005 12:51 am (UTC)
(Link)
Why does it matter if the person wants to do it? There's no rule against putting large pictures on the internet.
[User Picture Icon]
From:violettfem
Date:April 10th, 2005 04:42 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Nothhing in this stupid program works right.

out of pure frustration ibough sepreate photo hosting.

which isn't fair considering i have a paid account here.

[User Picture Icon]
From:robinhoodvandal
Date:April 16th, 2005 06:09 am (UTC)
(Link)
what part of 'beta' do you not understand?
[User Picture Icon]
From:violettfem
Date:April 16th, 2005 07:25 am (UTC)
(Link)
nice w/ the sarcasm
wakes a girl feel welcome
From:subbes
Date:April 20th, 2005 11:00 pm (UTC)
(Link)
While she's right in that FB is only a beta, part of the point of a beta is that users can point out bugs and problems and the devs can work on it. So if you have problems with FB, a better way to phrase it would be by describing the problems you have with FB so that the devs can respond and work on it, hopefully making FB a service you will want to use.
(Leave a comment)
Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com