?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 

Suggestion

About  

Previous Entry Suggestion Aug. 31st, 2004 @ 09:21 pm Next Entry
First off, YAY for paid users finally getting to use the photo hosting! :-D

Now my reason for posting: Is there any chance we might get to use simple HTML in picture descriptions sometime in the future? I'm not asking for anything scary, but just being able to use b/i/u/s as well as maybe links and possibly even LJ user tags would be fabulous. I totally understand if that's not feasible for whatever reason, though! :-)
Current Mood: energeticenergetic
Leave a comment
[User Picture Icon]
From:thetranquil
Date:August 31st, 2004 11:32 pm (UTC)
(Link)
First off, YAY for paid users finally getting to use the photo hosting! :-D

Seriously, hooray. *Major* motivation to pay for *all* my LJ accounts. *Runs off and does so.*
[User Picture Icon]
From:ladycoreopsis
Date:August 31st, 2004 11:50 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I think someone else brought this up awhile back, but I don't remember seeing an answer =). Thanks for bringing it up again.
[User Picture Icon]
From:zimzat
Date:September 1st, 2004 07:19 am (UTC)
(Link)
I can agree with allowing bold, italic, and LJ tags. Maybe adding underline and links (as those two can be misused or just annoying). I wouldn't like the strike code being available because then all those lines through the text... bleh.

Thumbs up for b/i/LJ-tags. =)
[User Picture Icon]
From:ianiceboy
Date:September 1st, 2004 07:48 am (UTC)
(Link)
The basic html tags would be good in photo descriptions and also PhonePost transcripts. Especially the LJ user tag.
[User Picture Icon]
From:ms_engineer
Date:September 1st, 2004 12:02 pm (UTC)
(Link)
LJ user tags would be useful in both picture and gallery descriptions for credits. Being able to link to sites would be good too :)
(Leave a comment)
Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com